EcoFlow RIVER 3 Plus
✓ Loads that fit EcoFlow RIVER 3 Plus's measured energy and output envelope
PORTABLE POWER COMPARISON
EcoFlow RIVER 3 Plus vs Anker SOLIX C300: capacity, output and trade-offs
Nearly identical rated capacity, but RIVER 3 Plus doubles both continuous output and solar input at a lower observed price -- C300 is worth considering mainly for its marginally lighter weight.
CONDITIONAL RECOMMENDATION
Choose by your exact workflow and constraints
Nearly identical rated capacity, but RIVER 3 Plus doubles both continuous output and solar input at a lower observed price -- C300 is worth considering mainly for its marginally lighter weight.
6 options
| Field | EcoFlow RIVER 3 Plus | Anker SOLIX C300 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 286Wh | 288Wh | |
| Usable range | 229–257Wh | 230–259Wh | |
| Continuous output | 600W | 300W | |
| Solar input | 220W | 100W | |
| Weight | 4.7kg | 4.1kg | |
| Observed price | $279 | $299 |
Anker SOLIX C300
✓ Loads that fit Anker SOLIX C300's measured energy and output envelope
MORE COMPARISONS
Other head-to-head match-ups involving EcoFlow RIVER 3 Plus or Anker SOLIX C300
BEFORE YOU COMPARE
Caveats behind the comparison
Assumption
Usable energy is modelled at 80–90% of nominal capacity.
Institutional rule
Boost modes are not equivalent to continuous inverter output.
Commercial change
Observed prices and product status vary by market.
Recalculate for your load
Demonstration dataMINIMUM MODELLED CAPACITY1,255 Wh
✓ 100 W output or higher
✓ 16.7–18.8 hours from an equal-size rated battery
✓ 1 kWh class
✓ Size solar from realistic daily input, not panel nameplate alone
Compare portable power stations →Affiliate disclosure
Potential commission does not determine the comparison result. No fake review score or unsupported winner is used.